From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 14:49:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B871C16A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:49:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469DA43D53 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrparsons@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so407826rng for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:49:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t08XCBexyGfUqZSwvFPXFHftByep6APNJ3Y9WtYHsf9hiQMsQI/vIV+943pBGJi3LZaBdfoT7ubynyTtrzmiEMHIRueFNyfWIoGIpSonJIZwMCmQ1GR3lGCDrwl4I9tcBQ57kKfjIM6HQ2zoYlPlvDqSm6N2h46igoZ58j7mlR4= Received: by 10.38.12.48 with SMTP id 48mr1197382rnl; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.86.22 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:49:17 -0400 From: "M. Parsons" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050414192002.I61191@Neo-Vortex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1113439764.7457.55947.camel@palm> <20050414192002.I61191@Neo-Vortex.net> Subject: Re: Route/arp help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "M. Parsons" List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:49:18 -0000 On 4/14/05, Neo-Vortex wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:38, M. Parsons wrote: >=20 > > I was under the impression (but would need to check to make sure) that > > all incoming packets are diverted to ng_pppoe when it is hooked into th= e > > Ethernet interface. > > > > This would explain your problems. > > > > Can you try this without the interface being used for PPPOE? >=20 > I have a single interface for PPPoE using netgraph and it connects to the > modem, and other computers fine >=20 > > > For the record, http://www.broadbandreports.com/faq/9693 is the page > > > on how you access the line stats, and the MAC part is required for my > > > modem. >=20 > The only reason i could think of as to why it is required, is if its ip > address isn't 10.0.0.1 as you think it is and for some strange reason it > accepts ip packets as its own if the ethernet header points to its MAC > address... try setting it to DHCP and see if you get an ip... else look u= p > the manufacturer for the default ip and try a factory reset >=20 I think things are going overboard here, Im just going to give up. I have tried it with pppoe being down, still couldnt connect to the modem. I was told on another msg board that if I did: ifconfig ed0 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add -host 10.0.0.1 -interface ed0 arp -s 10.0.0.1 00:0b:23:2a:b0:c4 would be the equivalent of the 3 linux commands, but alas, those 3 dont work either. Again, thanks to all that have tried, again, its just line stats, so I can live without them. Mark