Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 13:46:12 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r387637 - in head/devel/tcllib: . files Message-ID: <556602E4.9020106@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <55660165.3050106@FreeBSD.org> References: <201505271719.t4RHJXY6010274@svn.freebsd.org> <55660165.3050106@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27.05.2015 13:39, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> +lib/tcllib/tcllibc/%%BINARCH%%/tcllibc.so > Bundling libraries is bad. > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/bundled-libs.html >From the link: Some software requires the porter to locate third-party libraries and add the required dependencies to the port. Other software bundles all necessary libraries into the distribution file. This is not, what is happening here. The tcllibc.so contains the compiled implementations of the tcllib's modules. > It will also confuse pkg unless BUNDLE_LIBS=yes is added. > > Can tcllib not use critcl from its own package? Critcl port does not install binaries. "critcl" and "tcllibc" are different things -- the former helps out with compiling C-code, the latter is a result of such compilation. Yours, -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?556602E4.9020106>