Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:26:20 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> To: Tom <tom@sdf.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE and nice still ignored Message-ID: <20040131175609.T10185@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <20040131134854.A18293@light.sdf.com> References: <200401312146.32847@harrymail> <20040131212419.GA76513@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200401312231.59784@harrymail> <20040131134854.A18293@light.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Tom wrote: > From what I know of "nice", it should reduces the processes scheduling > priority. There is no definition in the nice manpage on the exact > definition of reduced priority means. "Reduced priority" is subjective. Different schedulers are free to more-or-less do whatever they want behind the scenes with the nice value. The expected behavior is of course the preempting of the process that has a higher nice value by a gradually stepped amount. Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040131175609.T10185>