From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 9 11:37: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.mich.com (mercury.mich.com [64.79.64.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8013A37BEFC; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:37:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm007-041.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.81.73]) by mercury.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02704; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:36:55 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3220D1999; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:33:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:33:44 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Mark Ovens Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review/comments - new option for uname(1) Message-ID: <20000809143344.L29987@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Ovens , current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000809005929.K250@parish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20000809005929.K250@parish>; from marko@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:59:29AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:59:29AM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > Is there any reason why this is unacceptable and could not be committed? Because it can be done with an awk/sed script? -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message