From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 14 17:35:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C217D16A47B; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE5F13C46A; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9EHY6cv013843; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:34:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:34:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20071014.113429.1649777355.imp@bsdimp.com> To: linimon@hub.freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20071014171922.GA61934@hub.freebsd.org> References: <89545.1192382078@critter.freebsd.dk> <20071014171922.GA61934@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rpaulo@fnop.net, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, phk@phk.freebsd.dk Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf files ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:35:55 -0000 In message: <20071014171922.GA61934@hub.freebsd.org> Mark Linimon writes: : On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 05:14:38PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : > To write some new code that works inside a sensible architectural : > framework that doesn't needlessly push tons of crap into the kernel. : : I have already written a protest to core about the tone, timing, and : public nature of your email. : : Since this is a) an architectural issue, and b) has already been made : inflammatory, I strongly suggest that the issue be handled by core@ and : not further argued on this mailing list. I didn't find phk's tone all that objectionable, and I also objected to the framework going in. We've certainly had much worse in the past. : I will not be following this discussion further, pending their intervention. I'll not be participating in that discussion, since I have very strong objections to the commit that were totally blown off. Now I have to go and look closely to see if any of them were silently corrected based on my feedback. Warner