Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:27:31 +0100 From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de> To: OutbackDingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions on development(7) Message-ID: <473B3E13.9040502@fs.ei.tum.de> In-Reply-To: <1195064181.1295.4.camel@z60m.optimlabs.com> References: <E1IqTxn-0001He-La@clue.co.za> <4734B397.4010905@elischer.org> <20071113194530.GA1281@kobe.laptop> <200711141748.08300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20071114141302.GE2177@kobe.laptop> <473B39B4.9040302@fs.ei.tum.de> <1195064181.1295.4.camel@z60m.optimlabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OutbackDingo wrote: >> I suppose you know about fromcvs. I also guess you know that I suggest >> using git instead of hg. Doesn't produce nasty large index files either :) > So would you think cvs -> git -> hg might be easier to accomplish ?? > Since one of my goals is to update projects Ive done based on FreeBSD > that require OS level updating No, I think git is the better SCM, but that's a personal decision. Fromcvs converts to both hg and git, using the same algorithm. I'd appreciate any help fleshing out the last bugs (also re: scalability). I'm considering it beta grade quality, but I know of many people using it on a daily basis without problems. cheers simon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473B3E13.9040502>