Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:19:30 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ObsoleteFiles and TARGET_ARCH Message-ID: <4C347EE2.6080301@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100706.174919.29649800801850.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20100706.174919.29649800801850.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/06/10 18:49, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I'm wondering... > > Why do we use TARGET_ARCH so much inside of ObsoleteFiles? It seems > like it should be used only when we obsolete files on some > architectures, but retain them on others. Instead, it seems to be > used to obsolete files that normally exist on a specific > architecture. This seems backwards. > > Also, we need to change this, but I don't (yet) define a > TARGET_CPUARCH. > > Also, why is this TARGET_ARCH and not MACHINE_ARCH? That suggests > we're invoking it wrong if this is "needed" for the cross build case > to "work". > It mostly seems to be used to remove things from /usr/include/machine, in which case it should also probably be TARGET, not TARGET_ARCH or TARGET_CPUARCH. -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C347EE2.6080301>