From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 11 19:58:19 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895C6106568E;
	Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930F68FC0C;
	Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <48F10579.8000103@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:58:49 +0100
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
References: <48EFAA0B.1030908@mykitchentable.net>
	<06069130@bs1.sp34.ru>	<48F101D1.6050506@FreeBSD.org>
	<39988226@bs1.sp34.ru>
In-Reply-To: <39988226@bs1.sp34.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Drew Tomlinson <drew@mykitchentable.net>, mnag@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libncurses.so.6 Not Found - How to Get 32 bit Version?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:58:19 -0000

Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>
>>> You can copy this file from 6-i386 as Kris has already said.
>>> And it may be a good idea to file a PR about it since this is
>>> definitely the port's bug (CCing to the port's maintainer).
>> I don't think it's a port bug, but it would be useful to have an
>> official way to install the i386 compat libraries on amd64.  This
>> should probably be a separate slave port.
> 
> The port installs both amd64 and i386 libraries (look at the port
> pkg-plist.amd64). Isn't it an official way? Imho yes.
> 
> One library is missing. Isn't it a port bug? Well, imho, yes. ;-)

OK then :)

Kris