Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Nov 2024 07:02:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 282326] [NEW PORT] x11/sx: Start an X.Org Server
Message-ID:  <bug-282326-7788-apGxhFzSiU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-282326-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-282326-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282326

--- Comment #5 from Alastair Hogge <agh@riseup.net> ---
(In reply to Vlad Biley from comment #3)

> 1. When I created this, I noticed that I was not present in the CC List a=
utomatically, so I did it manually. Should I do this, or will I get emails =
about my reports anyway?

Good question, I have no idea; I think you have to add yourself, like you h=
ave
concluded; it is a UX design pattern I do not understand.

> 2. Why does pkg-plist in the previous attachments look like a modified fi=
le when it is actually a new file just like the others? I will upload a scr=
eenshot in the next attachment.

Directly above the line:
> 0-                             1 The small NOTES section of sx(1) is a mu=
st-read.

is the word "Added" (diff segment header), this is meant to indicate that t=
he
following is new, if you look at other bug reports, the modified header wou=
ld
be something like:
> (-)b/port-category/fu-port/Makefile (-15 / +53 lines)
> Lines 1-39=20
> minus this
> add that

Did you run your Port thru the various Port tools, portlint(1), portfmt(1),
portclippy(1), and poudriere-testport(8)?

I believe reviews.freebsd.org. is the preferred place for new Ports too.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-282326-7788-apGxhFzSiU>