From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 20: 2:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA1937B408 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 20:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Red Hack)) id 174vEM-0006DF-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 15:01:34 +1200 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:00:37 +1200 (New Zealand Standard Time) From: Juha Saarinen To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Message-Flag: " " X-X-Sender: juha@vimfuego.saarinen.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Makoto, On Tue, 7 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > It's another story and not a scope of my interests. If BIND9 gets > enough maturity level for everybody's daily use, it would be a good > option for that. Seems OK here, but I admit that my installations aren't exactly heavy-duty. > But BIND9 is quite different from BIND8 (many existing features are > lost by some reasons); I'm afraid that BIND9 for 4-stable breaks POLA. Which existing features are you thinking of? I could be wrong, but my impression is that BIND 9 adds several features over BIND 8, not the other way round. -- Juha Saarinen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message