Date: Tue, 4 Jul 1995 20:26:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com> Cc: "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: 0622 installation woes (/nfs not found) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950704202153.8517C-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <199507050247.TAA28306@freefall.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 4 Jul 1995, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > I guess I wasn't clear on the problem. The problem is if the distribution > is sitting on another FreeBSD machine, rfc1323 and rfc1644 will be negotiated. > Many annexen and other terminal servers cannot handle these packetts, so > any tcp session will fail to a host that supports the advanced tcp options. Are you saying that Annex terminal servers fail to handle TCP packets with rfc1323 and rfc1644 options on connections passing through the terminal server, or on connections to the terminal server? In otherwords, FreeBSD --> Annex --> FreeBSD, or FreeBSD --> Annex. If it is the first option, why is the terminal server looking at TCP options when it is acting as an IP router? Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950704202153.8517C-100000>