From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 09:56:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AF916A4CE; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:56:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from volginfo.ru (ns.volginfo.ru [217.23.84.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F192F43D6D; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from den@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (llp-13.vistcom.ru [217.23.84.68]) by volginfo.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8391B2014; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:56:18 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <412F053E.8000404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:56:14 +0400 From: Denis Peplin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040205 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rhodes References: <200407271353.i6RDrYdm037688@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200407271353.i6RDrYdm037688@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mac chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:56:17 -0000 Hello! Tom Rhodes wrote: > trhodes 2004-07-27 13:53:34 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mac chapter.sgml > Log: > Wording and content enhancements. > > Some content stolen from: rwatson > > Revision Changes Path > 1.15 +153 -89 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mac/chapter.sgml > This is strange: --- patch --- @@ -101,7 +104,7 @@ information in this chapter may cause loss of access to the system, aggravation of users, or inability to access the features provided by &xfree86;. More importantly, MAC should not - be relied upon to completely secure a system. The + be relied upon to secure a system. The MAC framework only augments existing security policy; without sound security practices and regular security checks, the system will never be completely --- patch end --- If this is not secure at all, what is it?