From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Apr 16 3:57:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA23937BBCF for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 03:57:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26503 for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:57:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA00528 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:57:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C5937B687 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:42:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id RAA26403; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:42:23 -0700 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda26401; Sat Apr 15 17:42:11 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id RAA17931; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004160042.RAA17931@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdM17926; Sat Apr 15 17:41:48 2000 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Mailer: nmh 1.0.3, Exmh 2.1.1 X-Sender: cschuber To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shells In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2000 18:02:54 PDT." <20000415180254.T4381@fw.wintelcom.net> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:41:47 -0700 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000415180254.T4381@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > * Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group [00041 > 5 17:26] wrote: > > With commit of tcsh, I'd like to raise another question. Are there any > > plans to replace sh with bash. Granted they're not 100% compatible, > > though my only experience with bash vs sh incompatibility was over 6 > > years ago on a Linux system, I still think it's a good idea to replace > > sh with bash. > > A lot of messages in the tcsh import thread explain why bash is not > going to replace /bin/sh. Sorry, the search of -arch said it was "not available". I'll do a manual look-see through the archives myself instead. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message