Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:13:17 -0700
From:      "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Help wanted: Install of p5-JSON-Parse removes Perl ???
Message-ID:  <60171.1572588797@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b4dbaff-9eb3-4e9d-bf62-505683dc7ce1@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <2b4dbaff-9eb3-4e9d-bf62-505683dc7ce1@gmail.com>, =

MJ <mafsys1234@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Yeabut is that a good excuse to render my already installed Perl
>> non-functional, which is exactly what happened?
>
>Well what's it to do? If you have one package dependent on 5.28.2 and ano=
ther =

>one on 5.30.0 then it has no choice.

Yes, it does.  Stop and require manual intervention is a reasonable choice=
.

>Perhaps what would be preferred is that it stops any install and tells yo=
u
>that the package needs 5.30.0 and you have installed 5.28.2? That would
>seem more logical.

We agree.

>> But that seems like a minor concern at this point.  Far more troubling
>> is the fact that pkg, in its infinite wisdom, somehow decided to instal=
l
>> two versions of Perl at the same time, breaking both in the process.
>
> From afar it didn't break both, it just failed to add a softlink. Is tha=
t not
> the case?

I am able to answer that question definitely at this point in time, hoever
now that I have Perl back and working again I see that the /usr/local/bin/=
perl
file on my system is quite distinctly and certainly *not* a synmlink, and
also, the file inseld is showing up on ls -l as having a link count of 1.

>>
>> I hope that somebody will look at that.
>
>Well, nobody here will unless the maintainer for perl is active. If you w=
ant
>this looked at, I suggest contacting the port maintainer and/or raising a
>bug report.

ACK


Regards,
rfg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60171.1572588797>