From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 26 20:23:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B34C9A; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [208.86.227.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA9F1F90; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (70.15.88.86.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [70.15.88.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F13B45EA0; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:23:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us F13B45EA0 Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:23:07 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Andrew Turner Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 Now Available Message-ID: <20131226202307.GB13109@glenbarber.us> References: <20131226162521.GK2009@glenbarber.us> <2B79BF2A-1798-40F5-AD6E-D560E9C6C1E7@freebsd.org> <20131226194830.4f6e5b13@bender.Home> <20131226195512.GA13109@glenbarber.us> <20131226202016.3071b815@bender.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131226202016.3071b815@bender.Home> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-arm ml , FreeBSD Release Engineering Team X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:23:11 -0000 --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 08:20:16PM +0000, Andrew Turner wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:55:12 -0500 > Glen Barber wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Andrew Turner wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:25:09 -0800 > > > Tim Kientzle wrote: > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > On Dec 26, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Glen Barber wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > > The third RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now > > > > > available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, > > > > > powerpc64 and sparc64 architectures. > > > >=20 > > > > What do we need to include some ARM images? > > > >=20 > > > > At a minimum, I would love to get an official RC3 build for RPi. > > >=20 > > > I would suggest we could build a tarball of armv6 userland and an > > > RPi image to dd to an SD card. > > >=20 > > > Building the former should be straight forward. > > >=20 > > > For the latter, assuming the release target is unable to build the > > > required U-Boot binary, we could use crochet. I'm not sure if we can > > > use a tarball as the input for this to guarantee both are the same. > > >=20 > >=20 > > The problem with using crochet is that it requires git on the build > > machine, which just adds to the minimum dependencies needed, both for > > crochet itself, and (last I was aware) an external uboot tree. >=20 > Github allows you to use svn to checkout a git repo with svn. There is > an option under the clone url to set it to subversion. >=20 > U-Boot should just be a tarball, if it is a git repo we would need to > make it a tarball for the release to supply the source as it is GPL. >=20 > > Maybe it is just more sensible to take what crochet is doing, and make > > that into a release target. >=20 > Yes, but I assume this is not feasible for 10.0. >=20 It depends on how the test builds go, which I am working on right now. They may not be considered "official", since we're at the end of the release cycle. But if I can get something working, I'll be happy to hand-roll -RELEASE builds. Glen --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSvJAqAAoJELls3eqvi17QR20P/0zUuqKhi7qsUgD2wWxl7sGJ GeHmZdjVqVQuQ9gkfHJOOOyJvJ4tDCCnLNluzcOF3mQJLWvSXnTTJqVpedriSQZO fgtEZmLmjT9a0Z1dfnmqnpYZXEXWXMKo+CI38G3aQGHttxDeyC47RJ93chx6Jalr p+R6QJfN7jWsthBPYdjty0FrRKBe33zd6l7bRWWXp4NKGNUaXYdtsCKY+CbrruRi 9XceoSgCYgpKlh0OBu2byJA6bgeJC7Xl32xYb2dkYVAenDSu+C+asRhriahyPp43 EDPXf8Q3wCe621H2fQijcMX8+me+olzzNRbbYV99XjUhmB2a9Za81+sg00DYaWxX IxzyH2D3BGPdjfUhATePvF6MZ60IPI0hyqNtezmlvh806q7oEevp/FsjBU/oGRSF AdgoxmA+IwoQHPiCzJtwQXB0Ic+kJVAT6HrxnqCUvGdGf3YqhATRK9nBIACbzQeh zuajJWD2FrAomC80v5ev46B6teVonBDZlZJfuX4+zRMocW+2uCmR/s7XgoasFtqw Jlf1MUpAiCpI19lQWCRBUhB8NoIl61hRgTJd6Xf+ssr/NwxeUssOwduftBKM5XyU cW58GHtKcco/5ayZ/Brba3/Fmwel3eXgfFKD/nhVUGZjQwVZaE3AhrFJWcfEBosL I67klEsZZGAGS+4QZd19 =kvX9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7--