From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Jun 26 0:50:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (unknown [203.96.92.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946A21512B for ; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:50:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker ([210.55.152.15]) by mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v04.00.02.07 201-227-108) with SMTP id <19990626075324.GZHW784493.mta1-rme@wocker>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:53:24 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary To: "Kelly Yancey" Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:50:12 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Using MS on FreeBSD sites Reply-To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz Cc: In-reply-to: <000101bebe48$f1a1fb40$291c453f@kbyanc.alcnet.com> References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Message-Id: <19990626075324.GZHW784493.mta1-rme@wocker> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I missed these messages altogether. My thanks to those that brought it to my attention. My apologies to those that have continued to support me. Petty wee things such as this topic get right up my nose. On 24 Jun 99, at 9:53, Kelly Yancey wrote: > As a side note, intended for the -advocacy list: while doing my quick > search I discovered something disturbing about the freebsddiary.com site > which I was not aware of...it's driven by Frontpage (blech). The tip off > what the search engine's URL: > http://www.freebsddiary.com/_vti_bin/shtml.exe/freebsd/search.htm. On the > other hand, the best I can tell it is running on some unix (it's got > sendmail at least)...but isn't this the sort of thing that could come back > and bite us? Maybe I'm just a little paranoid. :) First of all, thanks for visiting my site. I hope you found stuff which was useful. In one of the mailing lists, I read that one should not assume malice of that which can be explained by stupidity. In the case in point, I must give you the benefit of the doubt without judging your goals. Now to the point. I've never attempted to hide anything about my site. It's all very open. If you looked at the source for many of the webpages you'll find: Many will have noticed that I include articles on how I installed FP so it's no big secret that I use FP. I guess I should be flattered that you consider my site so significant that it could possibly have any repercussions whatsoever on the FreeBSD Project. But I think you are way off base. Hypothetically, let us assume that it does "come back and bite us". What would you propose we do about my site? Another point: I write Windows applications for a living. It's that income which allows me to write the Diary. Put it this way: without MicroSoft, "The FreeBSD Diary" would not exist. Any suggestions? Should my site be removed because of this? What about those FreeBSD people who also use MS products? I use FP because, for me, and I stress again, FOR ME, it does what I need and it does it well. That's all. And for the real kicker: I use FrontPage 98 which means I use Windows on my desktop. Does that bother you? What should we do about that? best wishes -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message