From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 20 11:28:27 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA04998
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 11:28:27 -0700
Received: from gw.itfs.nsk.su (gw.itfs.nsk.su [193.124.36.33])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA04967
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 11:27:33 -0700
Received: (nnd@localhost) by gw.itfs.nsk.su (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA23062 for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 01:26:16 +0700
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 01:26:16 +0700
From: "Nickolay N. Dudorov" <nnd@gw.itfs.nsk.su>
Message-Id: <199504201826.BAA23062@gw.itfs.nsk.su>
To: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: About 1.1.5.1 quality
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

	Here is just my experience with 1.1.5.1 and 2.1-development:

  one of my computers (386DX40, 8MB, 340 MB IDE) used to run 1.1.5.1
with named (primary for 4 zones and secondary for another 6),
gated (2 ethernets and 1 slip, RIP ), SMTP relay for about 300
UUCP-connected customers (modems and uucp connections established
by another comp). All this time I have to reboot it (unless it
hungs or reboots without me) every 5 days due to constantn
grows of used swap space.

	Now I use another computer (486SX33, 8MB, 540 MB PCI SCSI)
with the same functions  and with 2.1-development at April 9
CTM-500 level.  Today "w" shows 10+ days up and swap space is
used by 25% (from 35MB total). This number would be bigger if I
not restart named several times, but I could not find any
"unreturned" swap space.

	I know that this is only ONE example and 1.1.5.1 is
realy VERY stable system (my 1.1.5.1 USENET and news-mail server
usualy shows more than month up and I reboot it only to change
the UPS) but if you dont use some KNOWN experimental or broken
parts -current may bite 1.1.5.1 in some applications.

	N.Dudorov