Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:50:24 GMT From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/104884: Add support EtherChannel configuration to rc.conf Message-ID: <200702051650.l15GoOrP054515@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR conf/104884; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>, dougb@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/104884: Add support EtherChannel configuration to rc.conf Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:41:03 +0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1AFF4891C58A325D2BF554BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 04:14:50PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:10:18 GMT >>> FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org wrote: >>>> Thank you very much for your problem report. >>>> It has the internal identification `conf/104884'. >>>> The individual assigned to look at your >>>> report is: freebsd-bugs.=20 >>>> You can access the state of your problem report at any time >>>> via this link: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D104884 >>>>> Category: conf >>>>> Responsible: freebsd-bugs >>>>> Synopsis: Add support EtherChannel configuration to rc.conf >>>>> Arrival-Date: Sat Oct 28 16:10:18 GMT 2006 >>> I chased HEAD. Please see following patch. >>> Anyone, please handle this PR? >>> And I'll make a patch for 6-stable. >>> >> I've made my comments on this. Maybe someone else should review it? >=20 > It seems basicly fine and should be useful. (At least until someone > finally shoots the netgraph part of ng_fec in the head.) I'd like to > see "" be the offical way to not configure any fec interfaces. gif_up's= > use of NO is a mistake (IMO). It would be OK to allow "NO" as an > undocumented synanim for "". Agreed, as said in my previous post. I think we could just set gif_interfaces and fec_interfaces to "" in -CURRENT and add the "NO" compatibility in RELENG_6 when MFC time comes? That would be a candidate for 7.0 RELNOTES. Does it make any sense to you? --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --------------enig1AFF4891C58A325D2BF554BF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFx14kMxEkbVFH3PQRCs/uAJ9dx+NaGSyPnIFVmw8QGcTJ7orzygCcDqRl /Dhp6oOEDNkXhMopL6pBlHM= =0aIJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1AFF4891C58A325D2BF554BF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702051650.l15GoOrP054515>