From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 12:53:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6C237B409 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from titan.kleipool.org (e137166.upc-e.chello.nl [213.93.137.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652DB43FBD for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:53:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Reinier@Kleipool.org) Received: from io (io.ovs.kleipool.org [192.168.1.82]) by titan.kleipool.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id h2QKrGXp067385 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:53:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Reinier@Kleipool.org) From: "Reinier Kleipool" To: Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:53:14 +0100 Message-ID: <001d01c2f3d9$b8f741e0$5201a8c0@ovs.kleipool.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20030326102330.V892@man-97-187.ResHall.Berkeley.EDU> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.2 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1 autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Subject: RE: pam_ldap... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:53:27 -0000 Yes me too! I have always found the lack of pam_nss a big omission in FreeBSD. Is this under development for 5.1??? I really hope! Kind Regards, Reinier Kleipool -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tak Pui LOU Sent: woensdag 26 maart 2003 19:26 To: Jacques A. Vidrine Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_ldap... > > Why FreeBSD do not support ldap authentication? (nss_ldap) > > files, nis, hesiod??? do we live in the past? One of great > > things in 5.0 release for me, should be this! :) > > Wait for FreeBSD 5.1. Does that mean there will be official support for nss_ldap in FBSD 5.1? Is it on the -current right now? I would like to test it. --- Lou _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"