Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:49:15 -0500 From: Lucas Bergman <lucas@slb.to> To: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how can you say ufs is faster? Message-ID: <20010406094915.A1618@billygoat.slb.to> In-Reply-To: <13713697115.20010406121725@21cn.com>; from bsddiy@21cn.com on Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 12:17:25PM %2B0800 References: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0104012107450.31373-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com> <13713697115.20010406121725@21cn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am not disagreeing with you for your case study or OS for that > matter as I do prefer freebsd much over linux anyday. IN a test I > did where qmail was overloaded with mail on both a linux fs then a > freebsd fs, linux fs outperformed freebsd no problems. Ufs , maybe i > am wrong but is way slower when writing to files. I don't know much about FS internals, but I smell a rat. Namely, I hope the above results aren't because you have your mail drive mounted async on the Linux machine. This short-circuits qmail's reliable delivery. Lucas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010406094915.A1618>