From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Nov 11 18: 2:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from shell.nominum.com (shell.nominum.com [204.152.187.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBC837B479; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:02:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from vademecum (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.nominum.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0625C3190C; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 18:02:04 -0800 (PST) From: "Mathias Körber" To: "Greg Lehey" , "Doug Barton" Cc: , , "Mathias Körber" , "FreeBSD Committers" Subject: RE: BIND 8.2.2-P5 Possible DOS Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 10:02:02 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20001110193512.I1686@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm currently in a Singapore Linux User group meeting, and we were > discussing this matter. Mathias K=F6rber of Nominum is of the opinion > that it's wrong to use BIND 8.2.3-T6b in -STABLE. He also doubts that > this particular bug is fixed in this version. I don't have enough > knowledge of the issues to comment. Does anybody else? Please note: I said I personally would not think using any -BETA product in a release is not so good a thing. I also said that I'm not sure whether it is fixed in 8.2.3, as a) the fix is new b) I'm not in the development cycle in Nominum It turns out that 8.2.3* whatever does not have the bug, so is safe, but that was not clear (to me) at that point. My opinions in this matter are not official opinions of Nominum in any case. Mathias >=20 > Greg > -- > Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key > See complete headers for address and phone numbers >=20 >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message