From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 18 0:45:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C28A37BA4D for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:45:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA35065; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:44:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:44:32 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Peter Jeremy , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Build status In-Reply-To: <14705.956042211@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Nar > vi writes: > > >The summary of summaries would roughly look like this: > > > > Subject: -current build report > > > > Success: world, generic > > Fail: lint > > The First part of the email is a summary just like that. > See what Boris Popov writes on the issue. I am sure there are more people who think that a big status report is not cost effective, if they can get a *short* summary, and an url where they can get the full report. > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message