From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 25 17:11:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17770 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 17:11:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from homer.supersex.com (homer.supersex.com [209.5.1.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17765 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 17:11:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leo@homer.supersex.com) Received: (from leo@localhost) by homer.supersex.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id UAA10481; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19980725201202.20511@supersex.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:12:02 -0400 From: Leo Papandreou To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.8--last 2.X release? References: <199807251852.LAA21020@bogslab.ucdavis.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: <199807251852.LAA21020@bogslab.ucdavis.edu>; from Greg Shenaut on Sat, Jul 25, 1998 at 11:52:25AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jul 25, 1998 at 11:52:25AM -0700, Greg Shenaut wrote: [...] > > The reason I ask is because I am setting up a lab full of FBSD2.X > systems, and if by waiting a few months to get very subtle in how > I configure things I will end up with a significantly more stable > (in the sense of less-changing) system, then I will wait. (For > example, I won't bother replacing the 2.2.5 systems I already have > on them with 2.2.7). That doesn really make sense if you have the source and dont mind taking 10 minutes out to peruse the cvsup documentation. Staying current with -STABLE doesnt require fresh installs everytime something comes down the pike. > > -Greg > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message