Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:24:57 +0300 (EEST)
From:      Len Merikanto <lennu@tietoverkot.net>
To:        jsw@cywub.sitel.net
Cc:        chip.wiegand@simrad.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: replacing a cisco router with a fbsd box
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108311810340.218-100000@mail.tietoverkot.net>
In-Reply-To: <200108311458.JAA18684@iwww.sitel.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 jsw@cywub.sitel.net wrote:

> cisco routers are some of the most reliable and robust in the industry.
> 
> Check the config ... again ... that is usually the weakest link.
> 
> Yes, a peecee running xBSD, perhaps with a package such as Zebra, can and
> will work as a toasternet router, but the reliability and robustness of the
> hardware is usually inferior to that of a 'real' router such as a cisco,
> Bay, or the new kids such as Juniper or Extreme.
> 
> Good day      JSW
> 

just a note.

ive learned this insane thing even ciscos are good at routing and something less
cpu using tasks but when it goes to nat and firewalling you definetly have wrong
devices for example for testign im using cisco 2500 summti with 2 ethernets for
routing our ethernet into 10Mbit fiber and noticed poor cisco cant process more
than 4 Mbit on ties ethernet ports. 

also when your having access lists on cisco they lag cpu into 100% utility with
few simple access lists. so when using access lists be careful and check the cpu
usage on the cisco b4 believing its working fine.


it also has 2 serial ports which are max 2Mbit which clearly indicates that it
was not planned to do 10Mbit routing but only 2*2Mbit thorugh their ethernet
ports. been also using LARGE ciscos and those also start lagging as hell for
example with nat used to work at company with many thousand dialup lines behind
huge cisco that natted all ips from dialup modems into real internet ip number
and it really started to do poor performances when lines growed over 8 thousand
dial up lines.

what i would do in this situation is set up cisco to route just the internet
access set up nat and firewall on simple bsd box and we have working solution.


sorry for my bad english but i guess you guys catch the clue.

"Cisco is used and will be used as good router, just dont do any tricks with it"


Len Merikanto,		Phone:	+358968691950
Tietoverkot Oy		Mobile:	+358409008494
Munkkisaarenkatu 2	Fax:	+358968691935
00150 Helsinki, Finland



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0108311810340.218-100000>