Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      10 May 2001 11:18:23 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Cc:        Michael Sharp <msharp@medmail.com>, FreeBSD-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ipfw
Message-ID:  <xzpy9s5k1eo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <15097.44366.138725.618271@nomad.yogotech.com>
References:  <20010509200335.7680.cpmta@c000.sfo.cp.net> <15097.44366.138725.618271@nomad.yogotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> writes:
> Not true.  Rules are processed in order, and if you don't give a rule
> number I don't know the order that a rule is inserted on the list.

The new rule is inserted at highest existing rule number (except
65535) + 100.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpy9s5k1eo.fsf>