Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:35:46 -0600 From: John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com> To: Igor Robul <igorr@speechpro.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> Subject: Re: Quality of FreeBSD Message-ID: <42E506D2.3080607@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <42E48967.1020909@speechpro.com> References: <200507211803.j6LI34dV005050@ferens.net> <20050721194500.W9208@fledge.watson.org> <20050721192613.GA61902@FS.denninger.net> <42E48967.1020909@speechpro.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Igor Robul wrote: > Karl Denninger wrote: > >> Ok, Robert, but then here's the question.... >> >> How come the ATA code which was very stable in 4.x was screwed with in a >> production release, breaking it, with no path backwards to the working >> code? >> >> > I had not ANY problems with ATA on several mothersboards, both SMP and > uniproc. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The VIA SATA onboard controller on my server works (and has worked) flawlessly. I have two identical 80G Maxtor SATA drives connected to it and have had absolutely no problems and excellent performance. Even my Dell Inspirion 5100--with a few hiccups--has made great progress and is mostly functional. jmc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42E506D2.3080607>