From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 15:09:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F058637B401; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C1043FE0; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:09:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from daemon.mj.niksun.com (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) h6HM8llT084584; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:08:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) X-RAV-AntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses. From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: deischen@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:08:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307171808.45353.jkim@niksun.com> cc: Kai Mosebach cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Threads in top X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:09:29 -0000 On Thursday 17 July 2003 05:55 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Thursday 17 July 2003 05:44 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > > > > Can you make showing threads No by default? I know the > > > current top shows threads by default, but I don't think > > > it should. > > > > Well, I just wanted to keep default behavior intact, just like > > ps(1). *shrug* > > Yeah, I realize that, but the default behavior is wrong ;-) > This was brought up in a different thread a few weeks > ago, and there was no heartburn over defaulting it to > not showing threads by default. If majority thinks that's the way it should be, I have no problem as long as it behaves like ps(1). After all, I am not a committer. ;-) Jung-uk Kim