From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 10 09:43:14 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2D116A401
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:43:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4906C13C45D
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:43:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HbCsN-0000db-HF
	for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:42:59 +0200
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:42:59 +0200
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:42:59 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:42:48 +0200
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <evfm6p$751$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <euca4b$6l8$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20070328100536.S6916@besplex.bde.org>	<euh5hh$iis$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20070330062726.I2388@besplex.bde.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig75FCAF2FA895EF3969DECB66"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911)
In-Reply-To: <20070330062726.I2388@besplex.bde.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: gvirstor & UFS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:43:14 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig75FCAF2FA895EF3969DECB66
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bruce Evans wrote:

> Apparently it get past the media size check in g_io_check() to give
> ENOSPC instead of EIO because g_io_check() only checks the virtual
> size.  To support virtual overcommitted media, it is necessary for
> file systems to either do a physical check whenever they allocate a

Ok, what about this: What would happen if I "stall" the IO ops? When I=20
get into the ENOSPC situation (which can happen only during BIO_WRITE),=20
I can add the request in an internal queue, and process it only when I=20
reliably determine that a new physical provider is added (which I can)?

Would it interact badly with soft-updates timeouts?


--------------enig75FCAF2FA895EF3969DECB66
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGG1wYldnAQVacBcgRAsZPAKDgzKZH9BzOuL3T6+fhK0aEMKn5fQCfThE9
IjgdqdzICFyNJg53NcMWGlw=
=E+o3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig75FCAF2FA895EF3969DECB66--