From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 19:47:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60B516A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from liamfoy@sepulcrum.org) Received: from moutvdomng.kundenserver.de (moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10CC43D49 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from liamfoy@sepulcrum.org) Received: from [212.227.126.224] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de) by moutvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DlXfh-0004B2-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:47:33 +0200 Received: from host81-153-214-78.range81-153.btcentralplus.com ([81.153.214.78] helo=localhost) by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DlXfh-0002Za-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:47:33 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:47:31 +0100 From: "Liam J. Foy" To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20050623194731.GA1264@anarion> References: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0866@mvwcim1a.acuson.com> <200506231348.06197.algould@datawok.com> <86is04lvbd.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86is04lvbd.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Cc: Johnson David , freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, 'cali' Subject: Re: Explaining FreeBSD features X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:47:37 -0000 On Thu(23)/Jun/05 - , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "Andrew L. Gould" writes: > > On Thursday 23 June 2005 12:16 pm, Johnson David wrote: > > > If by "works", you mean people leave the community, then you are > > > correct. We all know what "F" in "RTFM" means. While we may not say > > > it with those words anymore, we still often say it with the same > > > abusive attitude. It's far more productive to say "RTM" than "RTFM". > > I have, on occasion, used "RTFM", ignoring the "F"; but not thinking > > about whether the reader would ignore it as well -- poor form on my > > part. I will certainly drop the "F" in the future. > > Why? Everybody knows the F stands for Fine :) > Wow, is that DES writing an email with a smiley face in it? Maybe god does exist after all. -- - Liam J. Foy liamfoy@sepulcrum.org