Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 12:06:58 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erich@alogt.com> To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.x -- New Install -- serious partition misalignment Message-ID: <20121208120658.4d115dc0@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <14190.1354925937@tristatelogic.com> References: <14190.1354925937@tristatelogic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:18:57 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote: > If possibility (c) applies, then I would also like to know if anybody > has any suggestions for how I might be able to get this problem > escalated so that (hopefully) it gets dealt with before 9.1-RELEASE > is finalized. 162 / 4 is 40.5. So, disk access on modern disks will be slower but not catastrophic. What irritates me more in this context is the fact that I have two card disks which are supposed to be identical. They come from the same factory but only one carries a label saying it has 4k sectors. I still would like to have at least two partitioning schemata available without much user interaction. At least one should allow the user to have /, /tmp, /var, /usr and /home in separated partitions. Call it the classic partitioning schema and have another one called modern. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121208120658.4d115dc0>