From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 16 13:54:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCC216A415 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz) Received: from service2.sh.cvut.cz (service2.sh.cvut.cz [147.32.127.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E39643D49 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:54:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by service2.sh.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3BA13776B; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:54:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from service2.sh.cvut.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (service2.sh.cvut.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05986-09; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:54:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from logout.sh.cvut.cz (logout.sh.cvut.cz [147.32.127.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by service2.sh.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D9913795A; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:54:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by logout.sh.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD6461C21; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:54:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <455C6DA1.7080303@sh.cvut.cz> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:54:41 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cesar Fazan References: <035c01c708d1$ccd5a8d0$46a014c9@IRONMAN> In-Reply-To: <035c01c708d1$ccd5a8d0$46a014c9@IRONMAN> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 OpenPGP: id=733031B4 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEUnMzWJm5S+0864pn5r blp/hnW2up7X7uqftbNRVUrW1LGBdGfHwJqPi3ScoYtBQzhDxGEwAAAAB3RJTUUH1QoQDDgyQtx8 HQAAAkNJREFUeJzFU0toU0EUPYu66CpGdCUUmoUJkpUDQUoNBVEUrBJsq1Ki2EIKIUZ8mydBhYi0 wVUXJVCLCrFN4DIEQdxIqdBIFsMkWD9YJClCRGKjJaviynjfe8RPogtXPcObuXPOPXd+PHj+Aeyo QNmobGLXVeANGM+GsP0B2yqHHNVoCD2LwLglVGZx7yXSlADR0uZu9C4Bpy3hUxPvH/cuUw6UoPCL h64I8KAJuMpwRU8uUMJy0OIpHVeXmulZoCc/t0LlTbJLEY1EudPRcnVjgAP5Osdl4K5HVP4+2bAI okaUA0Iq6Q59+Zy2eMWN6EpFTsa3+uD1+JKj4TPHuYTSMaLScLAaqk94YJqG4ds30hojOVgYoNJc NTztNU2TBYbhu9Aafnq08ORja37da1NwBrN/b7NVEc+b8yecuYkp08vNvLYneVZRaSH1vS0UnfHm OUPzWaZufHPmCWSdWrfeGVQQKmcsO4If8pAdXJ/xF4QQAeOVY1AQQcfirwkLUWeWVTgi6vaGt2xe BGzBEIMQorru8RxgPqY1V6uxYnwVBRZEI1ytCm3dE8mC2DgcbzCJGHdBEVDKuWDSwsrSGoqzJmNt 2jJpNueIH0qS8/0JrDKnVBdvOzIsdVr4zaX9dn9xcLLKdCtQGfutVacLE9Ja+yfbDvO4aMWrklfK /JYv15C8Kw9S10kup5Bys0N1bLdcn4HvTl/Xlh6Fpllwj5/XpH9BUXn/ym0Dvv7Rt2MywojpYiSi i7Hsscaa19zZ//y/hR+BT/ns80nmJAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF303EC116F9F2391C94B3B39" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at service2.sh.cvut.cz X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 tagged_above=-255.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL, TW_PF X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multipath support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:54:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF303EC116F9F2391C94B3B39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cesar Fazan wrote, On 15.11.2006 17:19: > Hello, >=20 > Is there any patch to a kernel level multipath solution for FreeBSD 6 > out there? Or does anyone think in implement that in a near future? > So far as I know, there is an old patch for FreeBSD 4.8 ... for FreeBS= D > 6 I can simulate a multipath with ipfw prob or with pf load-balancing, > but its not exactly what Im looking for. >=20 > OpenBSD 4.0 has now support for equal-cost multipath by default, but I > needed an unequal-cost multipath solution, like linux can do (iproute2 > weight based multipath). >=20 > Any help/clues for a FreeBSD solution? >=20 > Thanks. ng_one2many or ng_hub? -- VH --------------enigF303EC116F9F2391C94B3B39 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBRVxtp0NOZDESBK8FAQKN8Qf9GC2EaEk+rZHhxp1al28Qy/FzZMysLLJU CgA/ymJ+WN4UDeKCMUCi4bMNth8bNYykUB96B0Q0gQ0QWNXl4m464C8nkuR8+aHj mlEWd5J1LRzgFxjTw1k6Ru+2PVnC/GiCrUlU2Y2EJFmbujj+UBqHAh9FV8RNqvzt dbP1fWUOLcm+YqnpiEGKGtdPxYnEm3HPEumlifvJ0LWpgHne++GWMnmhYznMmlcp 8N1u952UcqvbAIalvWrLcA+Pmum+tTxtOk6gQWClc+HOd9S+fBzJKNlXrRHNtejO WbWb4+JKcrgO4Aroov4nuSCFSktBbLjzZ1egpSp5rRME8GNiWbQBEQ== =6oj7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF303EC116F9F2391C94B3B39--