From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Oct 20 21:59:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA18763 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 21:59:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from whizzo.TransSys.COM (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA18758 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 21:59:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.TransSys.COM) Received: from whizzo.TransSys.COM (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.TransSys.COM (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA16983 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:59:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199710210459.AAA16983@whizzo.TransSys.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: hardware@freebsd.org From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: PC/104 platform recommendations? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:59:33 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Anyone got FreeBSD running on a small (and perhaps inexpensive) PC/104 platform? I'm thinking about an application that would require either a 486 or Pentium with ethernet and some parallel I/O. The thing that gives me pause looking at the glossies are how useful Flash is on these puppies, and how "compatible" the VGA/LCD display hardware might be.. I've got some glossies on some WinSystems and Ampro hardware so far. louie