From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 16:25:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06FC8FF for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80DF8FC0C for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA17808; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:25:06 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <50CA0161.1060000@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:25:05 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ng_ether naming References: <50C9C012.8020306@FreeBSD.org> <50C9C55A.5090900@ipfw.ru> In-Reply-To: <50C9C55A.5090900@ipfw.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:25:09 -0000 on 13/12/2012 14:08 Alexander V. Chernikov said the following: > On 13.12.2012 15:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> ng_ether uses if_xname for naming its nodes. >> This could be troublesome for mapping interface names to their ng_ether companions >> in the face of interface renaming capability. Especially given that interface >> renaming and ng_ether _module_ loading may happen in an arbitrary order. >> >> I am not sure how to solve this best. >> >> One possibility is to use if_dname+if_dunit combination for ng_ether naming. This >> should be stable and available for querying. This behavior should also be >> backward compatible with ng_ether being compiled into kernel (if_dname+if_dunit == >> if_xname before any renaming could occur). >> >> Another possibility is to do ng_ether renaming when its interface is renamed. >> This seems nicer but appears to be more work and more intrusive, because >> interfaces would have to know about their ng_ether nodes. > > Not exactly. You can register for ifnet_departure_event and ifnet_arrival_event. > > Interface renaming is done via sending departure event with old name and arrvial > event with new one. Good to know. Thank you! So which approach sounds better? Or maybe there is even a better one? >> >> What do you think? >> Thank you. >> >> And just in case: >> $ ifconfig -l >> net0 lo0 >> $ ngctl list >> There are 2 total nodes: >> Name: re0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0 >> Name: ngctl11353 Type: socket ID: 00000003 Num hooks: 0 >> > > -- Andriy Gapon