From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 26 19:04:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004784C05E5 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3Csh5ZR0z4b7y for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BD9A54C05E4; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5C24C0573 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3Csh2GFQz4ZxD; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bcdf2602; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 20:04:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id acdf3ba7; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 20:04:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 463ef2e4; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 20:04:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 506e4f43 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 26 Dec 2020 20:04:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:04:17 -0500 From: LuMiWa To: Stefan Esser Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: portsnap Message-ID: <20201226140417.04225f3e@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <6d0d128b-9a75-34f4-830c-d8be05ded9cb@freebsd.org> References: <20201226124150.7c494410@dismail.de> <6d0d128b-9a75-34f4-830c-d8be05ded9cb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4D3Csh2GFQz4ZxD X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:04:25 -0000 On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:51:37 +0100 Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 26.12.20 um 18:41 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports: > > Hi! > >=20 > > Today I red again an email: > >=20 > > Subject: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap > > From: Steve Wills > > Date: 2020-08-04 18:43:20 > >=20 > > And as portsnap user I have a question: Do they planning > > deprecation of portmaster too? >=20 > No, I'm actively working on portmaster and have rewritten it from > scratch for better performance (and additional features, e.g. building > in a clean chroot jail, similar to synth or poudriere). >=20 > I have been using that version for more than one year, but the > functionality is not complete, yet. >=20 > On a test system with > 2200 installed ports it takes less than 10 > seconds to identify the ~600 out-of-date ports (that I keep in this > state for testing of the upgrade strategy function), which is more > than 30 times faster than the same operation with the "official" > portmaster. >=20 > Until completion of that version, I'll continue to maintain and > update the current portmaster port ... >=20 > Regards, STefan >=20 ...and I will continue to use portmaster. But I don't understand why we should no keep portsnap. --=20 =E2=80=9CWaiter! A cup of coffee without cream, please!=20 I=E2=80=99m sorry, sir, we have no cream, only milk, so can it be a coffee without milk?=E2=80=9D=20 =E2=80=95 Ernst Lubitsch=E2=80=99s Ninotchka