From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 18:26:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C44C37B420 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA259232D5; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 46D8F9F0F9; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:11:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:17:51 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable To: drosih@rpi.edu Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <20020212021141.46D8F9F0F9@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6 Feb, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > seeing for performance when they run current. # ll /etc/malloc.conf lrwx------ 1 root wheel 2B Aug 18 21:47 /etc/malloc.conf@ -> aj Bye, Alexander. -- Loose bits sink chips. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message