From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 2 14: 8:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5791937B4CF for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from NewLuxor.localdomain (151.33.118.41) by smtp2.libero.it; 2 Nov 2000 23:08:50 +0100 Received: from localhost (flag@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by NewLuxor.localdomain (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eA2JZZv07134; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:35:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from flag@libero.it) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:35:35 +0100 (CET) From: flag X-Sender: flag@localhost To: "Andresen,Jason R." Cc: James Lim , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problems with 4.2 beta and licq-0.85 onwards In-Reply-To: <3A008E4A.5CFFC322@mitre.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Andresen,Jason R. wrote: > Are we sure about that? Linux running friends of mine have no problems > at all > with Licq 1.0's stability. I figured it was some sort of threading > issue > or something. Some days ago I asked to the Licq port maintainer why He has deleted the licq 1.0 port. He tell me that a lot of people reported problem with licq 1.0 so He uploaded the old 0.85 licq port and is waiting for the upcoming licq release. Paolo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message