From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Feb 20 0:53: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-53.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871A237B491 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:52:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB64366B09; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:52:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:52:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dan Peterson Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND Message-ID: <20010220005256.A21695@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <20010219101234.A98114@danp.net> <20010219104338.B98114@danp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010219104338.B98114@danp.net>; from danp@danp.net on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:43:38AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Guys, this thread is off-topic for -arch ("discussions of FreeBSD architecture"). DJBDNS will not be imported into FreeBSD for reasons already given, so discussions of DJBDNS vs BIND should go to -chat. Thanks, Kris --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6kjBoWry0BWjoQKURAsg/AJ9RP0X2yHp9efbf8nGbBzv++mq5kgCfX+Ia SYwL8EwOZaJNnIt8vupKpi8= =OhiH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message