From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 16 20: 8:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com (cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com [24.3.25.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E115314C04 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 20:08:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sjr@home.net) Received: (from sjr@localhost) by cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA92357 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 23:06:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sjr) Message-Id: <199908170306.XAA92357@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 23:06:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" Subject: Should initial package creation make /usr/ports/packages? To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm having a little trouble following the logic in bsd.port.mk for the do-package step. If /usr/ports/packages doesn't exist, should it be created when you do "make package" in a port for the first time? If so, this doesn't appear to work. Thanks, -- Stephen J. Roznowski (sjr@home.net) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message