From owner-freebsd-security Sun Sep 24 13:39:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl (ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl [131.211.124.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081BE37B422 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 13:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl (Postfix) id 20B927B4; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 22:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 22:38:16 +0200 From: Mipam To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: mipam@ibb.net, "Vladimir Mencl, MK, susSED" , Ali Alaoui El Hassani <961BE653994@stud.alakhawayn.ma>, CrazZzy Slash , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: Encryption over IP Message-ID: <20000924223816.F590@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> Reply-To: mipam@ibb.net References: <20000924205556.D590@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:28:55PM +0200 X-Obviously: All email clients suck. Only Mutt sucks less! X-Editor: Vi X-Operating-System: BSD Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Your throughput goes down the drain, but it works fine and it's easy > to set up. And remember, sweeping generalizations are always wrong. > Not really. Tcp always assumes an unreliable carrier, which isnt the case in tcp over tcp. This can cause problems in some situations. Mipam. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message