Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:27:33 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree Message-ID: <20040604112733.GC98227@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040603151911.GB12727@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040602094940.GA80394@cell.sick.ru> <200406021056.53005.sam@errno.com> <20040603094626.GA89838@cell.sick.ru> <20040603151911.GB12727@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:19:11AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: B> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: B> > S> allocated using this mechanism. I did it once for vlan tags but botched it B> > S> (didn't handle module references properly) so backed it. But there's no B> > S> reason someone cannot redo it or convert other heavily used fixed size tags B> > S> to use a zone. B> > B> > Have you saved your efforts? May I look at them? B> B> They are in the CVS history of sys/net/if_vlan.c. I see now, thanks. Question to Sam: have you performed any tests? Is this definitely true, that UMAllocing in special zone is faster than general malloc()? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040604112733.GC98227>