From owner-cvs-etc Thu Sep 14 21:30:39 1995 Return-Path: owner-cvs-etc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA22285 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:30:39 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA22280 ; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:30:35 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA07671; Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:30:18 -0700 To: davidg@Root.COM cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc sysconfig In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Sep 1995 18:38:33 PDT." <199509150138.SAA00154@corbin.Root.COM> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 21:30:17 -0700 Message-ID: <7669.811139417@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > That is NOT correct. cvs operations refering to -rHEAD refer to the most > recent version of the relevant branch. It only refers to the most recent > version of the "main" branch when that is the branch it was checked out from > (or in other words has no sticky tag). But that doesn't make sense. To wit: cvs co -P -rRELENG_2_1_0 foomod cd foomod cvs update -jHEAD Will merge in the changes for *2.2* to foomod, not the "head" of the RELENG_2_1_0 branch, which is indeed sticky unless I'm grossly incorrect about how Rod put the tags down. Jordan