Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:36:22 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com Cc: julian@whistle.com, nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. Message-ID: <199911011936.OAA18744@hda.hda.com> In-Reply-To: <199911010221.TAA13961@mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Oct 31, 99 07:21:20 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > but that's wrong.. the memory is shared.. > > only the %sp register is differnet.. > > Right, my bad. > > Here's what I wrote to Sean. > > Thread share everything that a normal process, including a > thread-specific stack which is used to keep each thread's context > seperate from one another. I haven't caught up with you guys yet. This is what I asked about POSIX threading before: can stack be private per thread? There are obvious cacheing advantages, especially with threads across multiple processors. I'll have to buy the spec. Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Safety critical systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911011936.OAA18744>