From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 8 14:59:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C625D106568D for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCE58FC14 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id n98Exg0s028253; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:59:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:59:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:59:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20091007200959.3c93904f.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20091008062326.11720.qmail@avocado.salatschuessel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: jhell , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Oliver Lehmann Subject: Re: samba - SIGABRT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:59:47 -0000 On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > >>> This was caused by your setting of the following: >>> security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 You can reset that value to 1 and you should be >>> alright to operate like normal otherwise you will have to compile samba >>> over again with the above mentioned configure options. >> >> Yeah this caused the problem. I wonder how I could have find this by myself >> (google is not counting ;)) I mean, the Abort message is not very verbose >> what the problem is here > > Hi Oliver-- > > While it's probably a bug that the Samba port compiles --pie, it's also a bug > that our linking bits aren't handling PIE properly either. The goal is to > fix PIE with the non-NULL mapping feature in the immediate future, so with > any luck the abort message won't matter too much longer. How about reverting this change or defaulting security.bsd.map_at_zero=1 until either ports can handle this properly or our -pie is fixed, and we've had at least a release with pre-built packages that don't have the problem? -- DE