Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:03:44 +0200 From: albi <albi@scii.nl> To: "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions on EXT3 vs standard BSD partitions Message-ID: <20060630190344.a71cc40a.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <80f4f2b20606300944y57a8d7bfqba7dd75ab32fdf46@mail.gmail.com> References: <80f4f2b20606300944y57a8d7bfqba7dd75ab32fdf46@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:44:21 -0400 "Jim Stapleton" <stapleton.41@gmail.com> wrote: > I have to move between BSD and Linux on one system quite a bit, and I > was wondering if there were any reasons to avoid EXT3 on a filesystem > (such as /dev/ad0s1), as opposed to using the more standard BSD setups > (such as UFS on /dev/ad0s1a)? I'm thinking mostly in terms of > reliability, but also in terms of flexibility and speed. > > Is there anything that should absolutely stay in UFS (such as /boot?) as a side-note : last time i used an ext3 usb-disc on FreeBSD 5.4 there was still a problem with automatically unmounting at a shutdown/reboot leaving the ext3-filesystem "dirty", and could not be mounted after the reboot until a fsck was done, haven't tried this with 6.x yet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060630190344.a71cc40a.albi>