From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 20:47:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCCC0954 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53777A41 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so6026282wgh.0 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:47:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lb9t0/uOrOCMq1XPKV9Ay6CL+ijN8e0vVzGIDFXIArM=; b=HtmSET7qJ++tICyArPeOny6ZC3zWKYz9SmHf9AZywnJPZHmg4+Jztz12U1UG5iXeMr jguE1f1jhYgQc4uOnz7BsbYM1N6eyFJa8A8hnJu5T6n9KQ4b9Xd/Y4kZ+Z42ENIUq6Ia JstW8S3gVw+WGIptIc61xGe6K7Qpe3ct9kBNmpJ7PTGu10QQ6vcELeTF6FcmmQs9UP5y Vl5PdONpQ+lWU8MdNgtRqILYRaDLKdCZvGcRq/kF6t/W+eZJFWqGOUkpEFnacpWLUt/A G+Vztc5i0G5F2q1ASxPVclDsLedfESKfRWJ9jyuT3AWFTXC6Phl7/NHRBvi1Aowo5A65 8tuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWIr+BjaDwCCsncyvusp7kKb6QglO2rZvbylnMrm9pdWAJl86I8i9x8ftIU50nzYhKbSsu X-Received: by 10.194.9.98 with SMTP id y2mr673472wja.85.1423687640608; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.68] (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.141.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bi9sm24784367wib.18.2015.02.11.12.47.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:47:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DBBFD3.7010801@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:47:15 +0000 From: Steven Hartland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1: Intel dual port 10GbE card (82599EB): second port not present? References: <54DBBB95.2050901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54DBBB95.2050901@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:47:23 -0000 On 11/02/2015 20:29, John Jasen wrote: > I have several servers that have two Intel 10GbE ports on board. They're > technically Dell daughterboards which have two Intel 1GbE and two 10GbE > ports. > > However, the second ix interface is not accessible, and does not seem to > be available. From a brief look, it looks like ix0 and both igb > interfaces come up before SMP is started. The second ix interface is > attempted afterwards, but doesn't show up. > > Am I missing the obvious? > > IE, from dmesg: > > ix0: > port 0xfcc0-0xfcdf mem 0xd8d00000-0xd8dfffff,0xd8ff8000-0xd8ffbfff > irq 36 at device 0.0 on pci1 > ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > ix0: Unsupported SFP+ Module > device_attach: ix0 attach returned 5 > > ix0: > port 0xfce0-0xfcff mem 0xd8e00000-0xd8efffff,0xd8ffc000-0xd8ffffff > irq 34 at device 0.1 on pci1 > ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > ix0: Ethernet address: ec:f4:bb:c8:0b:12 > ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0GT/s Width x8 > > > > SMP: AP CPU #21 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #18 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #5 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #17 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #16 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #9 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #23 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #10 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #12 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #11 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #14 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #7 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #13 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #4 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #8 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #19 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #15 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #22 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #6 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #20 Launched! > > > > ix1: > port 0xfcc0-0xfcdf mem 0xd8d00000-0xd8dfffff,0xd8ff8000-0xd8ffbfff irq > 36 at device 0.0 on pci1 > ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > ix1: Unsupported SFP+ Module > device_attach: ix1 attach returned 5 > > > > ix1: > port 0xfcc0-0xfcdf mem 0xd8d00000-0xd8dfffff,0xd8ff8000-0xd8ffbfff irq > 36 at device 0.0 on pci1 > ix1: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors > ix1: Unsupported SFP+ Module > device_attach: ix1 attach returned 5 Your problem looks like its the SFP's which are "unsupported" to which the attach will fail with error EIO (5). You can set hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 in /boot/loader.conf to enable unsupported SFP's but be aware you "doing so your on your own". Regards Steve