From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 02:38:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC84106566C; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEF18FC1F; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2N2Zq0w034669; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:35:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:35:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20100322.203553.752311254955266835.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <201003221605.24538.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20100322.125937.278730673160410010.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100322.130512.864843819464264610.imp@bsdimp.com> <201003221605.24538.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander@leidinger.net, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CTF patch for testing/review X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:38:32 -0000 In message: <201003221605.24538.jhb@freebsd.org> John Baldwin writes: : On Monday 22 March 2010 3:05:12 pm M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <20100322.125937.278730673160410010.imp@bsdimp.com> : > M. Warner Losh writes: : > : In message: <20100322172104.14234yawbsev0sw8@webmail.leidinger.net> : > : Alexander Leidinger writes: : > : : Normally we use MK_xxx for things which are opt-in/opt-out. What about : > : : using MK_xxx instead of ENABLE_CTF? If people are in favour of MK_xxx, : > : : what should the xxx part look like? : > : : > : Normally we *TEST* MK_XXX for things which are opt-in/opt-out and : > : require the user to say WITH_XXX or WITHOUT_XXX if they don't like the : > : default (or want to ensure they get option XXX, even if we turn it off : > : by default in the future). The default then gets encoded in : > : bsd.own.mk, and permeates the FreeBSD build system since we include : > : that everywhere, directly or indirectly. : > : : > : The problem is that bsd.own.mk is not included in sys.mk, nor should : > : it be. That's why we have the hacky combination of WITH_CTF and : > : NO_CTF that's there today. : > : : > : : Is bsd.kern.mk included in module builds too? : > : : > : Yes. : > : > One last thing I should have said was that the patch that was posted : > earlier in the thread looked ok, and likely couldn't be made : > significantly better due to the bsd.own.mk issue. : : I think the patch is a good approach, I just think it needs to default to not : enabling CTF by default. Instead, various bsd.foo.mk should selectively : enable it. I should have added that bit as well... Warner