From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 12:03:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7DA106568C for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vulpes.vvelox.net (vulpes.vvelox.NET [74.200.198.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B358FC1D for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42 (c-67-173-22-216.hsd1.il.comcast.net [67.173.22.216]) (Authenticated sender: v.velox) by vulpes.vvelox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40867B840; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:08:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:04:44 -0500 From: "Zane C.B." To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20081013070444.56c4dad6@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <20081013122726.X56368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081012162321.V39974@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081012175941.4d675ad0@vixen42> <20081013122726.X56368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/f6kGRmPq=orQxGWJkkmaO57"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IAX2 (or SIP) softphone for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:03:14 -0000 --Sig_/f6kGRmPq=orQxGWJkkmaO57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> anyone know something good. > >> > >> good=3Dsimply, works well, preferably no or minimal GUI. > > > > The most reliable is 'net/ekiga'. I've run into problems with > > 'net/kiax' and crossing NAT. That was nearly two years ago so it > > may >=20 > for now kiax works for me (but no NAT), just they automatic gain > control and noise reduction should be disabled, as it works funny > at least :) >=20 > thanks Sweet! I am currently in the process of drinking a large amount of Jagermiester so this may not make to sense. The problem I originally ran into is that behind goat fraging NAT I would run into issues receiving calls. The problem I ran into is that even though it is suppose to tranvese NAT with out issue,I would never receive incoming calls. In more recent tests I ran into issues with it and seg faulting like it just fraged a goat. The situation I was running into problems with was with asteresik behind NAT as well as the IAX using client. It is a known issue, or was then. Search the Asterisk archives for this email address if you interested in it some more. That goatse.cx issue was why I originally switched to that fraged solution that uses that POS of using the goatseing Gnome stuff. One I get a bit of spare time I am going to wring something that uses ZConf. Any ways, have a great night! May your nights be as bathed in the mercury vapor glow as mine are. --Sig_/f6kGRmPq=orQxGWJkkmaO57 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjzOWQACgkQqrJJy0yxYQAu5QCeJqrTnBSk9pQeJGdK1Al7r+fd 4+wAoINynrKAVt6kf2vPg9hmW1xbrwQw =FtQG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/f6kGRmPq=orQxGWJkkmaO57--