From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 12 23:48:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AD816A400; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C9113C48E; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D5D2089; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:27:17 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0913B2087; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:27:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D3AF6B88C; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:27:16 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Eric Anderson References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAAE@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <45CD6AA6.1000003@freebsd.org> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAB0@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <45CD6FF5.8070007@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:27:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45CD6FF5.8070007@freebsd.org> (Eric Anderson's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0600") Message-ID: <86ire7gdnv.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Chris Haulmark Subject: Re: UFS2 with SAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:48:52 -0000 Eric Anderson writes: > Well, I'm not sure what issues they had, but have had fantastic > success with NFS and FreeBSD. FreeBSD with the right hardware and > tweaks can make some NetApp boxes look weak. *cough* WAFL *cough* I'd be very surprised, considering that NetApp filers run FreeBSD. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no