From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Aug  7 03:47:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA03841
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 03:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA03832
          for <freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 03:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id UAA16929; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 20:44:34 +1000
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 20:44:34 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199608071044.UAA16929@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de
Subject: Re: time calibration messages - to worry about?
Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> >Jul 27 16:00:14 isdn /kernel: i8254 clock: 1217043 Hz
>> >Jul 27 16:00:14 isdn /kernel: 1217043 Hz differs from default of 119318
>> >2 Hz by more than 1%
>> 
>> This means that one of your clocks, or the clock calibration method, is
>> inaccurate by more than 1% (15 minutes/day).

>Fine, but why? :-)

Don't know.  Local space-time warps? :-)

Bruce