From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 13 16:46:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AC61065676 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdb@carrick.bishnet.net) Received: from carrick.bishnet.net (carrick.bishnet.net [IPv6:2a01:348:132:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183E48FC19 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a01:348:132:51::10] (helo=carrick-users) by carrick.bishnet.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PyoQm-0009a5-0s; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:12 +0000 Received: (from tdb@localhost) by carrick-users (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2DGkBPJ036832; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:11 GMT (envelope-from tdb) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:11 +0000 From: Tim Bishop To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" Message-ID: <20110313164611.GB977@carrick-users.bishnet.net> References: <4D6ABD53.5090709@ukr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D6ABD53.5090709@ukr.net> X-PGP-Key: 0x5AE7D984, http://www.bishnet.net/tim/tim-bishnet-net.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1453 086E 9376 1A50 ECF6 AE05 7DCE D659 5AE7 D984 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS system unresponsive X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:06 -0000 Hi, On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:08:35PM +0200, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 27.02.2011 14:32, Tim Bishop wrote: > > I have a ZFS system that has become unresponsive. It's running amd64 > > 8-STABLE as of approximately 20 Dec. It has a UFS-based root file > > system and then a ZFS mirror for a handful of jails. > > > > It seems to get in to this state occasionally, but eventually can > > unblock itself. This may take hours though. > > In such cases, only helps the reset button. > I already wrote about this bug - kern/153351 > I have one machine updated to 8.2-PRERELEASE # 0: Fri Feb 18 18:27:12 > EET 2011 bug does not pop up yet ... I'm not sure this is the same issue as I'm seeing. Even when the system is running slowly things like ls still work, they just take a while. Tim. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984